Areas we cover
Selling Land in Nottinghamshire
Nottinghamshire splits into two quite different halves. Around Nottingham, the Green Belt and a new strategic plan set the rules. To the north and east, across Sherwood, Newark and Bassetlaw, the Green Belt falls away and councils are building well above their targets. The Trent runs through both. This page explains what that means for land in each part of the county.
Nottinghamshire at a Glance
Nottinghamshire has seven district and borough councils: Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Broxtowe, Gedling, Mansfield, Newark and Sherwood, and Rushcliffe. Nottinghamshire County Council handles roads, schools and minerals. Nottingham itself is a separate unitary council and is not shown in the table below, though it shares a strategic plan with two of the districts.
- No council is below 75%. Every council passed the Housing Delivery Test 2025 threshold. Ashfield, at 93%, is the only one below 95%, which means it must prepare an action plan.
- Some very high results. Bassetlaw delivered 357% of its requirement, the highest in the county by a long way. Rushcliffe delivered 172%.
- A Green Belt around Nottingham. The Nottingham and Derby Green Belt covers parts of Ashfield, Broxtowe, Gedling, Newark and Sherwood, and Rushcliffe.
- A shared plan for Greater Nottingham. Nottingham, Broxtowe and Rushcliffe submitted the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan for examination in December 2025. Gedling left the joint plan in 2025 and is preparing its own.
- The Trent. The river crosses the county from the south west to the north east, with a wide flood plain along most of its length.
Council by Council
The table shows each council's result in the government's Housing Delivery Test 2025 and where its local plan stands, using the Planning Inspectorate's own monitoring data.
| Council | Housing Delivery Test 2025 | Most recent strategic plan adopted | New plan progress |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ashfield | 93%Action plan | None listed | New plan submitted for examination, April 2024 |
| Bassetlaw | 357% | May 2024 | No recent stage listed |
| Broxtowe | 109% | September 2014 | New plan submitted for examination, December 2025 |
| Gedling | 125% | September 2014 | Left the joint Greater Nottingham plan in 2025; own draft plan consulted on June to August 2026Checked September 2026 on the council or government website |
| Mansfield | 134% | September 2020 | No recent stage listed |
| Newark and Sherwood | 139% | March 2019 | No recent stage listed |
| Rushcliffe | 172% | December 2014 | New plan submitted for examination, December 2025 |
Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026, with later milestones we have checked on council and government websites marked "Checked". A Housing Delivery Test result below 75% means the council is treated as having unmet housing need under policy S5 of the NPPF. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.
Rushcliffe
Rushcliffe covers the land south of the Trent, including West Bridgford, Bingham, Radcliffe on Trent, Cotgrave, Keyworth, Ruddington and East Leake, and the former Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station, which is part of the East Midlands Freeport. Much of the borough near Nottingham is Green Belt. It has built far more than its requirement in recent years, and its strategic policies are being replaced through the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan.
Broxtowe
Broxtowe covers Beeston, Stapleford, Kimberley, Eastwood and the villages between Nottingham and the Derbyshire border, including Toton. Much of its open land is Green Belt. Delivery is a little above target, and it is also part of the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan.
Gedling
Gedling covers Arnold, Carlton, Burton Joyce and Calverton, and its countryside is largely Green Belt. It withdrew from the joint plan in February 2025 to prepare its own Gedling Local Development Plan. The publication draft was consulted on from June to August 2026. The council expects to submit it in December 2026 and adopt it in spring 2028.
Ashfield
Ashfield covers Hucknall, Sutton-in-Ashfield and Kirkby-in-Ashfield, with Green Belt in the south around Hucknall. It still relies on its 2002 local plan review, which is why no recent strategic plan is shown. A new local plan was submitted for examination in April 2024. At 93%, Ashfield is close to target but below 95%.
Mansfield
Mansfield is a compact district based on the town and Market Warsop. Its plan was adopted in 2020 and it has built about a third more than its requirement. There is no Green Belt here.
Newark and Sherwood
Newark and Sherwood is a large district running from Newark and Southwell up through Ollerton, Edwinstowe and Sherwood Forest. Only a small part of the district is Green Belt. Its amended core strategy was adopted in 2019, and delivery is well above target.
Bassetlaw
Bassetlaw covers Worksop, Retford, Harworth and a large rural area down the Trent valley and along the A1. Its local plan was adopted in May 2024. It lies well beyond the Nottingham and Derby Green Belt. The former power station sites along the Trent, including West Burton, bring major energy projects to the area.
What Shapes Planning in Nottinghamshire
The Nottingham and Derby Green Belt
The Green Belt was set up to stop Nottingham and Derby spreading and merging with the towns around them. It wraps round the city on all sides and covers much of the open land in Broxtowe, Gedling and Rushcliffe close to the city. Since December 2024, land in the Green Belt that does not strongly contribute to its purposes can be treated as grey belt, and development on it can be allowed if it meets the Golden Rules on affordable housing, infrastructure and green space. Previously developed land in the Green Belt, such as old yards, can also qualify. Our grey belt guide explains the test.
The Trent Flood Plain
The Trent is the biggest planning constraint in the county after the Green Belt. Its flood plain is wide from Attenborough and the Nottingham embankments down through Newark and on past the Bassetlaw villages towards Gainsborough. Many riverside villages have land in Flood Zones 2 and 3, and the Idle, the Leen, the Greet and the Soar add their own risk. A site partly in Flood Zone 3 is not always ruled out, because the homes can often be kept to the drier land. See our guide to flood risk and development land.
Sherwood Forest
Parts of Sherwood are being considered as a possible future Special Protection Area for nightjar and woodlark. It is not designated, but Natural England asks councils to take a precautionary approach. Mansfield, for example, uses a risk-based checklist that looks at distance from the core bird areas, with larger housing schemes within 5 kilometres needing more careful assessment and sometimes new green space. We check this for land in Mansfield, Newark and Sherwood, Gedling and Ashfield.
Heritage and Infrastructure
Newark, Southwell, Worksop and many smaller places have conservation areas and important listed buildings, and heritage settings often shape layout and density. The A1, A46, A52 and M1 carry heavy traffic, and junction capacity and sewage treatment are raised on many larger schemes.
Where Growth Is Focused
Nottinghamshire has good rail links. The East Coast Main Line stops at Newark and Retford, the Midland Main Line serves Nottingham and East Midlands Parkway, and the Robin Hood line runs from Nottingham through Hucknall and Mansfield to Worksop. The areas we watch most closely are:
| Area | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Nottingham fringe | Strong demand, with Green Belt and grey belt questions on nearly every site. |
| Rushcliffe towns and villages | High values and high delivery, with the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan at examination. |
| Newark | On the A1, A46 and East Coast Main Line, outside the Green Belt, with the Trent to check. |
| Mansfield and Ashfield | Towns on the Robin Hood line and near the M1, with Sherwood Forest to consider. |
| Worksop and Retford | The main towns in Bassetlaw, which has a recent plan and very high delivery. |
| Larger villages | Many villages outside the Green Belt can take small, well-designed schemes through neighbourhood or local plans. |
We are interested in land of 2 acres or more on the edge of these towns and the larger villages around them, particularly where it has safe access to a road and sits above the flood plain.
What This Means for Your Land
No Nottinghamshire council is below 75% in the Housing Delivery Test, so the unmet need route under national policy does not apply here at the moment. The routes that do work depend on which half of the county your land is in:
- Local plan allocation. The Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan is at examination, Gedling's plan is due to be submitted in December 2026 and Ashfield's is under examination. Later plans under the new system will follow. See our guide to call for sites and local plans.
- Grey belt around Nottingham. Fields that do little to stop sprawl or merging, and old yards and buildings in the Green Belt, can qualify if they meet the Golden Rules.
- Previously developed land. Former pit sites, depots and yards, which national policy supports reusing.
- Sites near stations. National policy supports higher density homes close to well-connected stations. Whether that applies depends on the station and its service.
- Neighbourhood plans. Many villages in Rushcliffe, Newark and Sherwood and Bassetlaw have neighbourhood plans, some of which allocate sites.
- Council delivery
- Well above target, so no housing shortfall argument
- Constraints
- In the Green Belt, mostly Flood Zone 1, bounded by roads and housing on two sides
- Likely route
- A grey belt assessment, then either an application meeting the Golden Rules or putting it forward through a later plan
- Your costs
- None. Every planning cost, including any appeal, is paid by us
- What we would offer
- An option agreement with all planning costs paid for you and a term long enough to cover both routes
An illustration of how we think about a site, not a real offer. Every site is different, and our free desktop review looks at the specific field.
Around Nottingham, the Green Belt test decides most things. Further north, the question is usually flood risk, access and fit with the plan. In both cases the planning work costs money and takes time, which is why our agreements put those costs on our side.
The Land We Look for in Nottinghamshire
- Fields of 2 acres or more next to a town or a larger village.
- Green Belt land that is contained by roads, housing or other development.
- Sites mostly in Flood Zone 1, above the Trent flood plain.
- Former yards, pit sites, depots and other previously developed land.
- Land within walking distance of a station on the main lines or the Robin Hood line.
- Larger holdings of 20 acres or more that could form part of a strategic allocation.
If your land is in open Green Belt, on the Trent flood plain or close to the Sherwood heaths, it is not ruled out, but the bar is higher. We will be straight with you about it in our review.
Questions About Nottinghamshire
My land is in the Green Belt near Nottingham. Is it worth asking?
Yes. Some Green Belt land is grey belt, and some has been released through plans. We look at the council's Green Belt evidence and tell you honestly where your land stands.
What is the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan?
A joint plan for Nottingham, Broxtowe and Rushcliffe, submitted for examination in December 2025. Examinations can change sites and policies, so check the councils' websites for the latest position.
Why is Gedling doing its own plan?
Gedling withdrew from the joint plan in February 2025 to prepare a single local plan covering all of its own needs. It still shares evidence with its neighbours.
Does the Trent rule out my land?
Not always. The sequential test asks whether there are suitable sites at lower risk, and much depends on how much of your land is in Flood Zone 1. We map this in our free review.
How long will it take?
It depends on the route. A strong planning application is usually quicker than waiting for a new local plan, and we will tell you which route we recommend before you commit to anything. Either way, you pay nothing towards the planning and you keep using your land throughout. Our guide on how long planning takes explains the stages.
Sources
- GOV.UK: Housing Delivery Test, 2025 measurement
- Planning Inspectorate: Local plans, monitoring progress
- Nottingham and Derby Green Belt (Wikipedia)
- West Bridgford Wire: Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan to be submitted for examination
- Gedling Borough Council: Emerging local plan
- Ashfield District Council: Local Plan
- Mansfield District Council: Risk-based approach for nightjar and woodlark at Sherwood Forest
- East Midlands Freeport: About us
We update this page when new Housing Delivery Test results or local plan milestones are published. Planning positions change quickly, so always check the council's own website before relying on it.
Find Out What Your Land Could Be Worth
A free, confidential desktop review of your land. No cost and no obligation.