Skip to content

We pay for the planning. If it fails, you keep your land.

Call us:020 7946 0850

Areas we cover

Selling Land in Worcestershire

Worcestershire splits into two halves for planning. The north is mostly West Midlands Green Belt, and Bromsgrove is well below its housing target. The south has just adopted a new joint plan covering Worcester, Malvern Hills and Wychavon. Add the Severn flood plain and two National Landscapes, and the right route for your land depends a lot on where it sits.

Worcestershire at a Glance

Worcestershire has six district councils: Bromsgrove, Malvern Hills, Redditch, Worcester, Wychavon and Wyre Forest. Worcestershire County Council is responsible for highways, schools and minerals. The districts decide housing applications. Worcester, Malvern Hills and Wychavon share one plan, the South Worcestershire Development Plan.

  • Bromsgrove is below 75%. It delivered 58% of the homes it needed in the Housing Delivery Test 2025. It is treated as having evidenced unmet housing need under policy S5 of the August 2026 NPPF, but most of the district is Green Belt, where S5 does not apply and grey belt policy does.
  • Worcester is below 95%. The city delivered 88%, which means it must publish an action plan. It is not below the 75% line.
  • The rest are delivering. Wyre Forest delivered more than double its requirement, Redditch 129%, and Malvern Hills and Wychavon just over 100%.
  • A new plan in the south. The South Worcestershire Development Plan Review was found sound in March 2026 and adopted by the three councils on 26 March 2026.
  • Two National Landscapes. The Malvern Hills on the western edge and the Cotswolds around Broadway in the south east.

Council by Council

The table shows each council's result in the government's Housing Delivery Test 2025 and where its local plan stands, using the Planning Inspectorate's own monitoring data. Note that the monitoring data had not yet caught up with the adoption of the South Worcestershire plan in March 2026.

Housing delivery and local plan position of each council in Worcestershire
CouncilHousing Delivery Test 2025Most recent strategic plan adoptedNew plan progress
Bromsgrove58%Below 75%: unmet needJanuary 2017No recent stage listed
Malvern Hills101%March 2026South Worcestershire Development Plan Review adopted March 2026Checked September 2026 on the council or government website
Redditch129%January 2017No recent stage listed
Worcester88%Action planMarch 2026South Worcestershire Development Plan Review adopted March 2026Checked September 2026 on the council or government website
Wychavon103%March 2026South Worcestershire Development Plan Review adopted March 2026Checked September 2026 on the council or government website
Wyre Forest212%April 2022No recent stage listed

Sources: Housing Delivery Test: 2025 measurement, MHCLG, published 17 August 2026; Local plans: monitoring progress, Planning Inspectorate, August 2026, with later milestones we have checked on council and government websites marked "Checked". A Housing Delivery Test result below 75% means the council is treated as having unmet housing need under policy S5 of the NPPF. Local plans move quickly, so always check the council's own website for the latest position.

Bromsgrove

Bromsgrove sits between Birmingham and Worcester and covers Bromsgrove town, Wythall, Hagley, Alvechurch, Barnt Green and many smaller villages. Its current plan dates from January 2017, and the council has since started a new local plan under the new system, with a scoping consultation that ran from July to September 2026 and a draft plan expected in summer 2027. Delivery at 58% is one of the lowest in the region. Because almost all the open land here is Green Belt, the practical tests are grey belt and the council's own Green Belt review, not the unmet need policy.

Redditch

Redditch is a former new town with a tight boundary and little land left inside it. Some of its growth has been planned on the edge of the town within Bromsgrove district. Its plan dates from January 2017. Delivery is above target, at 129%.

Worcester, Malvern Hills and Wychavon

These three councils plan together. Their new South Worcestershire Development Plan Review was adopted on 26 March 2026. Worcester city has little open land, so growth for the city has long been planned in urban extensions just over the boundary in Malvern Hills and Wychavon. Malvern Hills covers Malvern, Tenbury Wells and Upton-upon-Severn. Wychavon covers Droitwich Spa, Evesham, Pershore and a large rural area. With a newly adopted plan and delivery at or above target in two of the three, the route for new sites here is the next review.

Wyre Forest

Wyre Forest covers Kidderminster, Stourport-on-Severn and Bewdley. Its plan was adopted in April 2022, and delivery reached 212% of the requirement. Much of the land around the towns outside the built-up areas is Green Belt.

What Shapes Planning in Worcestershire

The West Midlands Green Belt

The Green Belt covers most of Bromsgrove, much of Wyre Forest, the land around Redditch and the north of Wychavon near Droitwich. It was drawn to stop Birmingham and the Black Country spreading south and to keep the Worcestershire towns separate. Since December 2024, land that does not strongly contribute to Green Belt purposes can be grey belt, which opens a route for some sites, subject to the Golden Rules. Our grey belt guide explains how that is judged.

The Malvern Hills and the Cotswolds

The Malvern Hills National Landscape runs along the western edge of the county, shared with Herefordshire and Gloucestershire. The Cotswolds National Landscape reaches into Wychavon around Broadway and the villages below the escarpment. Inside either one, major development is only allowed in exceptional circumstances. Land in their setting, especially in views from the Malvern ridge, is assessed carefully.

The Severn and Its Tributaries

The Severn runs the length of the county, through Bewdley, Stourport, Worcester and Upton-upon-Severn, and these places have a long history of flooding. The Teme, the Avon through Evesham and Pershore, and the Stour through Kidderminster add more flood plain. Land in Flood Zones 2 and 3 faces the sequential test. Many farms have their best development land well above the river meadows, and a layout that keeps homes on the higher ground can still work. Our guide to flood risk and development land explains the approach.

Heritage

Worcester has its cathedral and historic centre, and there are conservation areas in Pershore, Upton, Bewdley, Broadway and many villages. As elsewhere, heritage tends to shape the layout and number of homes rather than stop a scheme outright.

Roads and Rail

The M5 runs north to south past Bromsgrove, Droitwich and Worcester, with the M42 in the north and the M50 branching off in the south. Worcestershire Parkway station opened in 2020 where the Cotswold line crosses the Birmingham to Bristol line. Congestion on the roads into Worcester and school capacity are common issues raised at planning stage.

Where Growth Is Focused

Growth in Worcestershire follows the M5 and the rail lines, with pressure from Birmingham in the north and a planned programme around Worcester in the south. The areas we watch most closely are:

AreaWhy it matters
Edges of WorcesterUrban extensions in Malvern Hills and Wychavon, now supported by the newly adopted plan.
Bromsgrove and its villagesLow delivery and strong demand, with Green Belt and grey belt questions on almost every site.
Droitwich SpaA market town on the M5 and the railway, close to the Green Belt edge.
Evesham and PershoreTowns in the Vale of Evesham with rail links, outside the Green Belt but with Avon flood plain nearby.
KidderminsterThe largest town in Wyre Forest, with strong delivery and Green Belt around it.
MalvernHigh demand and values, with the National Landscape close on one side.

We are interested in land of 2 acres or more on the edge of these towns and the larger villages, where there is a safe route to a road and most of the land is out of the flood plain.

What This Means for Your Land

The right route depends on which half of the county you are in. In the south the plan has just been settled. In the north the Green Belt decides most things. The main options are:

  1. South Worcestershire, the next review. The plan adopted in March 2026 has fixed the main sites for now. Land that is not in it can be put forward for the next review, and early preparation helps. Our guide to call for sites and local plans explains how.
  2. Bromsgrove's new plan. Bromsgrove is carrying out a new Green Belt assessment for its plan. Landowners who put evidence forward now are in a better position when draft sites are chosen.
  3. Grey belt. In Bromsgrove, Wyre Forest and around Redditch, land that does little to stop sprawl or merging may qualify. The Golden Rules on affordable housing, infrastructure and green space apply.
  4. Previously developed land. Old yards, poultry units and commercial sites, which national policy supports inside and outside settlements, including in the Green Belt in some cases.
  5. Land outside the Green Belt in Bromsgrove. Where a site is outside the Green Belt, the council's low delivery means it is treated as having unmet need. Other constraints still apply.
Illustrative example: a 6-acre paddock on the edge of a Bromsgrove village
Council delivery
58%, below the 75% line
Constraints
In the Green Belt, flat and well contained by a road and existing houses on two sides
Likely route
A grey belt assessment, then either an application or putting it forward through the new Bromsgrove plan
Your costs
None. Every planning cost, including any appeal, is paid by us
What we would offer
An option agreement with the planning costs paid for you and a term that allows for either route

An illustration of how we think about a site, not a real offer. Every site is different, and our free desktop review looks at the specific field.

Worcestershire suits landowners who can be patient in the south and precise in the north. In both cases the planning work is detailed, and under our agreements it is paid for you. See how it works for the full process.

The Land We Look for in Worcestershire

  • Fields of 2 acres or more next to a town or a larger village.
  • Land with a road frontage, or a route to one you control.
  • Sites mostly in Flood Zone 1, above the Severn, Teme, Avon and Stour flood plains.
  • Green Belt land that is already partly enclosed by development, or has buildings on it.
  • Former yards, glasshouses, poultry sheds and depots.
  • Larger holdings of 20 acres or more on the edge of Worcester, Droitwich, Evesham or Kidderminster.

If your land is in the setting of the Malvern Hills or near Broadway, the bar is higher. We will still look, and we will tell you plainly what we think.

Questions About Worcestershire

Bromsgrove is below 75%. Does that mean my Green Belt field will get permission?

No. The unmet need policy that applies below 75% does not apply in the Green Belt. The question there is whether your land is grey belt, and whether a scheme can meet the Golden Rules.

The South Worcestershire plan was just adopted. Have I missed my chance?

Not necessarily. Plans are reviewed, and the new system expects plans to be kept up to date. Land that is well placed and well evidenced can be put forward for the next round.

My land floods at the bottom. Is it worth asking?

Often, yes. Many sites near the Severn and Avon have a dry area large enough for homes, with the lower land used for open space and drainage.

Do you look at land near the Malvern Hills?

Yes, but development inside the National Landscape faces a very high bar. Sites on the edge of towns just outside it, and out of the main views, are more promising.

What will it cost me to find out?

Nothing. Our desktop review is free, and if we go ahead we pay the planning costs. Our page on land value explains how prices are worked out.

Sources

Find Out What Your Land Could Be Worth

A free, confidential desktop review of your land. No cost and no obligation.